economics
Bonk supply: the file’s number and the story’s number
After reading this, you should be able to keep the vendor’s supply print, the scan’s creator line, and the project’s distribution story in three columns.
Published 2026-10-12. Substantive review 2026-10-12. Figures are the observation time.
What matches
On the ranking row, market cap and fully diluted value print as the same quantity. As with other assets in this library, that means the source used one supply figure for both labels. It does not, by itself, prove there is no unissued remainder the vendor failed to model. It does say the vendor is not currently showing one.
The scan line for creator history has read, in the print this franchise uses, as the dev holding 0.0%. That is a holding at scan time for the address the scanner calls the creator. It is compatible with a large historical distribution and it is compatible with other explanations. It does not reconstruct who received the December 2022 allocation.
What holding confers
The scan shows a zero transfer fee and no transfer hook. Those are properties of moving the token, not rights attached to holding it. This evidence pack contains no fee share, no staking claim and no governance contract that BONK controls. If the project operates products elsewhere, they are outside this pack until a dated source is attached.
What this page does not establish
- No allocation table has been checked against the mint’s largest accounts.
- CoinGecko’s circulating-supply method is not re-derived.
REVIEW WHEN
- Creator holdings leave zero.
- Market cap and fully diluted value diverge.
- A transfer fee appears.